I’ve stopped watching the TV news lately.

Friday, April 27, 2007 at 10:10 pm | In gripes | Leave a Comment

Part of the issue is that I got all riled up and angry watching the news.  Where are the ethics, and responsibility?  When does it stop being about sheer numbers and viewership, and more about moral responsibility as a journalist?

Either way, I’m disenchanted lately with the news.  It is no longer part of my daily diet of what I watch.  I’ve tried to get more of my news from slightly more reliable sources such as NPR or New York Times Online.  We’ll see how that goes.  So far, so good.  :)   At least I’m no longer ranting on this blog about my feelings about the news and media.  And THAT is a good thing.

Facebook security Issues part 2

Wednesday, April 18, 2007 at 12:19 pm | In gripes, technology | Leave a Comment

Datamining is something I don’t like.  That’s why when I go to places like Ikea or some other clothing store and they ask for my postal code, I simply say, “no.”

Datamining occurs everywhere.  Whether we like it or not, our data, be it our purchasing patterns related to our credit cards, or our medication profiles related to our pharmacy are mined and sold off to the highest bidder.

 But I guess facebook is a little bit more insiduous in that we offer up quite a bit of data, pictures, relationships, contacts, education and much much more.  Here is an interesting link:

http://www.albumoftheday.com/facebook/

Facebook and security issues

Friday, April 13, 2007 at 9:20 am | In gripes, technology | Leave a Comment

It seems to me that facebook collects (or has the opportunity to) collect much more information than the other platforms out there.  To even join a “network” that is a university/college, it requires you to enter in your personal email account at that particular institution.  Some people even have their resumes (work history) on there so to speak.  Literally, be it friend, foe, neighbour, peeping Tom, Dick, and Harry, or employer can do a search for your name and look you up.

Even worse, is people can tag others on pictures.  So yesterday, as I took a look at facebook, I realized I belonged to a network, which allowed me to see a lot of pages of people who belonged in the network.  And a classmate of mine had signed up, and then put really embarrassing pictures of another classmate who was extremely drunk and silly looking on her facebook album.  And to top it off, she had tagged it.  Lovely.  At that very moment I was thanking my lucky stars I wasn’t the one in her picture.  How embarrassing.  There it was, out there for the world to see.

And then… there was another classmate who had received a “private” e-present in the picture of a thong, but for some reason it was available for everyone who was a friend of the person to see.  Ewww.  Also embarrassing.

Anyways, it seems according to wikipedia, Facebook has quite a bit of issues with security.  I can just even think of datamining being a big issue with this as people have their real names, their school affiliations, their coursework, their emails, contacts, relatives, and friends… the list is endless.  Scary actually.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook

In fact, wiki talks about how 2 students from MIT downloaded OVER 70 000 PROFILES from facebook as part of a research project.  Here is an excerpt from wikipedia:

Privacy concerns

There have been some concerns expressed regarding the use of Facebook as a means of surveillance and data mining. Theories have been written about the possible misuse of Facebook[22] and privacy proponents have criticized the site’s current privacy agreement. According to the policy, “We may use information about you that we collect from other sources, including but not limited to newspapers and Internet sources such as blogs, instant messaging services and other users of Facebook, to supplement your profile.” However, some features—such as AIM away-message harvesting and campus newspaper monitoring—have been dropped and Facebook has since responded to the concerns. Facebook has assured worried users the next privacy policy will not include the clause about information collection and has denied any data mining is being done “for the CIA or any other group.”[23] However, the possibility of data mining by private individuals unaffiliated with Facebook remains open, as evidenced by the fact that two MIT students were able to download, using an automated script, over 70,000 Facebook profiles from four schools (MIT, NYU, the University of Oklahoma, and Harvard) as part of a research project on Facebook privacy published on December 14th, 2005.[24]

Great… food for thought. 

wrong email address…. again?

Thursday, March 29, 2007 at 3:30 pm | In gripes | Leave a Comment

Someone keeps emailing me at my university email address, thinking I’m someone else. This isn’t the first time this has happened. Since I have a very common last name, apparently there do exist people in this world with identical first and last names as I.

Like getting a wrong number telephone call, with the first email, I responded politely to the person saying that he was mistaken and was emailing the wrong person. Seemed like a polite thing to do. He was emailing me pictures from his vacation. The person the email was intended for, he had met at the university gym. He was emailing me from his university email address (as he is a professor there), and clearly the email was not spam. He apologized in response, and that was the end of that.

Anyhow, today (several ? months later), I find in my inbox another email from him. Exasperated I was about email him to let him know, “wrong email again buddy..” but decided I would rather simply just delete his email instead. Afterall… I do not know this person, and would prefer to limit my interaction with him. And then, a few hours later, he has sent me yet ANOTHER email, this time with a picture attached.

*sigh*

From the overtones of the email, he is clearly interested in this girl he met at the gym (whom he thinks he is emailing). Unfortunately for him, his email is not reaching his intended destination. Too bad for him.

I’ve warned him once… from here on in, I’m blocking him and sending his email right into the trash. The dating world is fraught with landmines and difficulties in this world. One would think that the least you could do is get the correct email address.

How annoying.

Honesty in the Medical Profession?

Saturday, March 24, 2007 at 10:44 am | In gripes, health | Leave a Comment

Being quite familiar with the medical profession, I am more aware and educated than the average patient.   Unfortunately yesterday was a day that tested my abilities in communication skills as well as assertiveness skills when I was on the other side of the desk. 

In general, I think most patients, and especially the immigrant population tend to approach the medical profession with a paternalistic attitude.  “Yes doctor… no doctor… whatever you say doctor” approach makes some patients feel comfortable.  And to some degree, some patients even expect and demand this is the type of relationship with their care providers.

However, as baby boomers age, and people become more educated, this paternalistic model of relating to one’s health care providers is changing.  I think more and more people are demanding to be an active participant in their care plan.  It is becoming more collegial and less paternalistic.  I think you see this shift in relationship as the population becomes more Caucasian, educated or fluent in the English language.  They have more questions, and want to know more.  Personally, I think it is only a good thing when a patient wants and desires to be an active participant in their plan of care.  They are learning to take responsibility for their own health.

Personally for me, I am of the latter group, and prefer to know my options.  I prefer to make an educated choice on my plan of care.  I prefer not to be treated like a child, and told what needs to be done without any rationale or reasoning.  Unfortunately in both Canada and the US, there are still physicians out there still practicing medicine with a paternalistic attitude.  Usually, those are the ones I mentally think, “what a bad doctor” and silently vow to never book another appointment with.

In health care, patients need to realize that they always have a choice.  Unfortunately there are some unscrupulous people out there who blatantly lie and tell the patient there is no choice. 

Here are few examples of what I have seen 2nd hand or noticed occuring, that simply rubs me the wrong way:

1.  1st time pregnancy and labour for a couple.  They are admitted to a teaching hospital for the delivery of the baby.  The couple feels they have no choice in voicing their feelings and unease over a resident (i.e. medical student) delivering their child, while the attending physician looks on (i.e. does other things).  As complications develop in the early stages, things get delayed, as it becomes more of a learning opportunity for the student rather than timely intervention by the health care professional.  Does the couple have the right to say, “we want the attending physician to deliver our child instead of the resident or intern”?

2.  Patient needs to recieve IV antibiotics and the RN is trying establish an IV line.  Unfortunately this is an inexperienced RN, and he/she starts poking and moving the needle around, causing much pain to the patient.  The patient tries to give the RN the benefit of doubt as RN fumbles around.  The first try is unsuccessful.  She is about to try the 2nd time around.  Does the patient have the right to request a different RN to do the procedure, or must the patient wait till the RN tries several more times before it becomes evident to all how incompetent he/she is?

The above situations are not my personal experiences.  However they are stories recanted to me by other people.  Would you believe that in the first situation, the couple waited patiently for the resident to their proper job, all the while having feelings of unease about the whole deal?  Would you believe that the soon to-be father was also a medical student in medical school?  Would you believe that complications arose, and developed to the point where a C-section was required, and it was only at that point that the attending stepped in?

In the 2nd situation, the poor patient felt the RN was incompetent from the get go.  Unfortunately she didn’t speak up until the RN was trying to get an IV line the THRID time around - unsucessfuly I might add.  When a more experienced RN came, she was able to get a line with the first try, with little effort.

What are the patients’ rights?  When can they speak up?  In a good provider-patient relationship, the patient will always feel at ease and comfortable enough to ask questions when it arises.  The patient will feel that they have options and control over their care plan.  They will know they can always speak up, and voice their concerns… and it is always their right to ask for a different health care provider.

ignorance… racism… stupidity

Monday, March 19, 2007 at 9:17 am | In gripes, politics, racism | Leave a Comment

www.cbc.ca/canada/quebecvotes2007/story/2007/03/16/boisclair-slanted-eyes-reaction.html

PQ leader Mr. André Boisclair used the term “slanted eyes” to refer to Asian students during a speech to university students in Quebec, Canada. He then refused to apologize when asked by Asian community leaders. Instead, he hid behind the remark that it is a common term used to describe Asians in Quebec.

hmmm. The last time I checked, the term “niggar” and “coloured person” was a common term only several decades ago in the US. Simply because the majority is on the bandwagon doesn’t justify one’s actions. Unfortunately for Mr. André Boisclair, apparently if the majority is stupid, it justifies his stupidity.

Ignorance and fear is understandable. And it is also understandable that ignorance leads to racist remarks. However, stupidity is in a class all it’s own. Unfortunately for the leader of the PQ party in Quebec, he has all 3: ignorance, racism and stupidity.

I don’t know why racist remarks get me up in such an ire. I do wish though that Asians would have a greater role in mass media than the ones that are currently in place…..

I see the irony… but does anyone see the gravity?

Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:00 pm | In gripes, politics | Leave a Comment

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2006/08/29/harper-sitcom.html

So apparently the Prime Minister of Canada flew into Saskatchewan to film his sitcom appearance. He played himself (the PM), and gave an interview to a gaggle of actors playing media reporters. Meanwhile the true group of reporters that gathered to interview the PM were left “cooling their heels hundreds of meters away”…

Oh what irony. The Prime Minister of Canada will spend time to be interviewed by fake reporters, but actually goes out of his way to avoid the real ones. Ironic.  Or maybe thats the reality he wants…

I just can’t picture George Dubya Bush appearing on a sitcom. Somehow, it seems the presidential role holds more gravity and seriousness than the Prime ministerial role.

What a shame that PM holds his role so lightly. I just hope he doesn’t blow away in the wind.

Gender equality….

Friday, March 16, 2007 at 11:38 am | In gripes, male female relationship | Leave a Comment

I recently read a post on one of the blogs I tend to read for entertainment:

http://waiterrant.net

Anyways, the “waiter” writes an anecdotal story of killing a mouse that is trapped on a glue trap in his restaurant. As I read the post, I can’t help but feel he has a bit of resentment in having to be a “man” and finish off the task of killing a mouse, even in today’s age of gender equality. The woman squeals over the trapped mouse, and walks away, and the man finishes off the dirty deed.

This brings about a point that has been bothering me for a while. The interpretation of women’s lib, gender equality, and equal rights for women. When I was in my adolescence, having grown up in North America, I completely felt women should have 100% equal rights as any man might have. They deserved the same opportunity. If you asked me, “could women survive on their own efforts?” I think I might have wholeheartedly said, “yes!”

But, as I continued to grow up, I now realize in my adulthood that men and women are not equal. God never wired us equally. We are so very different in the way we think and act and behave. I’m sorry to say, but men are usually stronger than women, and women are the fairer sex.

I also believe that fair is not equivalent to “equal”, as some people mistakenly think. For instance, is it “fair” that a teacher spends more time explaining a mathematical concept to the student with the learning disability than to the student who grasps it instantaneously? Yes, I believe that would be fair, given the circumstances. Would it be an equal division of the teacher’s attention? Absolutely not.

In history, women have often been oppressed and suppressed. The inability to vote, or even be paid fair wages was neither fair, nor “equal”. However, as society has moved onto embrace feminism (which I also have issues with), it seems we have also thrown the baby out with the bath water.

As a female, I’m not trying to have the best of both worlds. However, when the world thinks it’s “fair” for a women to also kill the same number of mice as men… well… something is a askew. I can’t help but notice how many men no longer offer up their seat on the bus, or subway. No longer do they remember the basic fact that women ARE the weaker sex, and don’t pack the same amount of brawn that they do. Women can’t lift the same amount of weight that they can, and actually do find it more difficult to lift heavy things.

I guess gender issues are something, we as a society often struggle with. I see it happen in every day-to-day life, as well as in the church. How do we approach gender roles? What is the role of women in the church? I vaguely recall hearing something about gender issues in my university years, and how it all began with Adam and Eve.

In today’s fallen world, there still must be a balance that we as Christians can hold towards treating the other gender. How do we get rid of chauvinistic thoughts, oppression of women, and fanatical feminism? How can we find the right approach in gender relationships?

I don’t have the solution. But I do know that when men in society forget basic manners, and forget that women are physically, emotionally and perhaps even behaviorally wired differently from them… it is a sad day. It is the beginning of women and men beginning to forget that God actually intended the 2 different genders to be be complimentary and helpful to each other.

So the next time you see a woman lifting a heavy object, or standing on a train, please try to remember that you are the man, and offer assistance or help. Off your seat, and be a gentleman. Good manners will never go out of fashion.

Stephen Harper on TV sitcom???!!!

Friday, March 9, 2007 at 2:32 pm | In gripes, politics | Leave a Comment

So today, I noticed in the paper that Stephen Harper, the PM of Canada is going to be appearing on a TV sitcom as himself. Here is a link to one article about his appearance:

http://jam.canoe.ca/Television/2007/03/07/3710293-cp.html

uh…. The last time I checked, the Canadian taxpayers’ monies were to be used to for salaries of federal employees who served Canada. Can someone please tell me what part of the Prime Minister’s job description includes acting on a tv sitcom, and memorizing script lines???!!!

I just hope that Mr. Stephen Harper has decided that his 2nd career shouldn’t be done at the taxpayer’s expense, and hopefully took an upaid vacation day for furthering his acting career.

I try not to get too idealistic about politics, and certainly understand that making it as an end-all, be-all solution to all the world woes is simply futile. However, for the many dollars the PM gets paid every year, every month, every day, every hour and every minute, I would think he would at least try to use his time to better the welfare of the general Canadian. But the acting stint only seems to benefit Mr. Harper himself, namely name recognition, increased propaganda and increased fame.

Perhaps, just perhaps… Mr. Harper should spend more time in front of the cameras that can actually question his actions (i.e. infront of journalists) and that are more relevant to his job description, rather than doing this one-way propaganda in this sitcom. From what I understand, he has clamped down on press conferences to keep a tight reign of control on media portrayal of himself as well as his party. I wonder what he is so afraid of? I thought democracy was about questions and answers. Even George Bush, with all his grammatical blunders and sometimes brain infarcts seems to be undaunted by the press.

http://www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/ccs/Current-Constitutional-Issues/

Freedom-of-Expression—Current-Sub-Issues/

Freedom-on-the-Press-and-Prime-Minister-Harpers-Media-Policy.php

What is the federal Canadian government coming to? All glory and not guts. He talks about decreasing federal deficits, and then spends his valuable time memorizing script lines and going to a set of a tv show to do some acting. Well… hopefully his body guards also took unpaid vacation days as well for protecting him while he was acting. We won’t even get into the issue of his chauffeur.

Perhaps he got his script mailed to his home residence (thereby not occupying any valuable federal resources), and didn’t spend time reading his script, and simply drove himself to the acting studio (without a chauffeur), and didn’t have any body guards to protect him, and didn’t use his cell phone or blackberry during his acting stint (which of course the taxpayers are paying for as well).

Maybe, just maybe, Mr. Stephen Harper has some sense of work ethics…. and actually thought that appearing on a tv sitcom actually helped out the average citizen? Yes, and maybe I was just born yesterday.

Ah… I’ll stop ranting now. grrr.

The departed…. the movie… plot spoiler warning

Saturday, February 24, 2007 at 8:37 pm | In gripes, movies | Leave a Comment

I used to be a huge movie buff in my university days.  Nothing was more of a treat than going out and watching a movie.  Then the fun of dissecting it to pieces and debating it over dinner….

Now, I’m lucky if I get to watch a movie in the theaters once a month.  Anyways, I saw a bit of the “The Departed” by Martin Scorsese on a plane recently.  About halfway through, we landed, and I never did finish it off.  So trying to figure out the ending was literally making me antsy.  I raved on and on about the movie, and said, “no wonder it’s being considered for an Oscar… it’s a great film…”

Well… as any true Martin Scorsese movie buff would tell you, the ending is obvious.  I was told, “well, if it’s a Martin Scorsese film, expect everyone to be killed off at the end.”

 ”Not possible!” I replied in disbelief.  “The film has developed the characters and the plot so well… there is no way he would kill them off at the end.  That would be just stupid.”

Well… prepare to be stupified.  Last night we rented the DVD for “The Departed”.  Needless to say, I felt immensely disappointed by the ending.  Not only was it a blood bath, but it also left me feeling a bit cheated. 

What a beautifully developed story line, with fully fleshed out characters, and then… just a mass of shootings and killings.  No explanation, nothing.  It’s anticlimactic.  It’s like he spent so much of his energy building up the characters, plot and storyline, that he ran out of energy and didn’t know what to do, and in a puerile fashion simply decided if everyone died, it would solve his dilemma and end the story.

Now having seen the ending, I think that he deserves not to get an Oscar.  But I can only surmise he will get one, given that movie critics are prone to liking the unusual and the unexpected.

sigh.  I felt so unresolved at the movie ending… never mind the gruesomeness of the killings.  I have to say though, Leonardo DiCaprio is a great actor.  His depth of acting never ceases to impress me.

Monk the sitcom

Saturday, February 24, 2007 at 8:25 pm | In gripes, racism | Leave a Comment

I actually like the sitcom “Monk”.  It’s quirky, cute and he is such an odd ball endearing character.  I also like the fact that like an Agatha Christie novel, the show allows the reader the opportunity to try to solve the puzzle. 

However, last night’s episode of Monk was rather annoying.  The typical stereotypes of minorities were portrayed on the small screen.  There was the black FBI leader who was constantly yellling, and brimming with hostility and anger.  Must our African American brothers always be portrayed as incompetent yelling maniacs full of pure anger all the time???

 Secondly, there was the very annoying, brainy, subservient and obedient Asian male FBI agent who “knew-it-all” except the true essence of the how to solve the crime scene.  He had all the newest and fanciest gadgets that he comandeered, but was stupidly obviously ignorant.  argh.

Then the typical racist scene, where the black man is yelling an order (something along the lines of “get this thing off of me!!!”), and the only person to jump to obey him is, who else… the little asian man.

When will Hollywood stop portraying racist stereotypes?  Why is the Asian male always portrayed as such a wimpy obedient guy who listens to orders no matter how ridiculous they are? 

grrrr…..  Sometimes it makes me almost want to do something proactive….. sometimes…

Canada post

Saturday, February 10, 2007 at 3:43 am | In gripes | Leave a Comment

Someone please explain to me how express post, next business day delivery turns into a 3 to 4 day delivery that spans Tuesday all the way to the end of Friday?  Sometimes the incompetence if baffling.   Truly baffling.

I think there is good reason why people pay for FedEx… and to sum it up, it’s called reliability

So here I thought it was government inefficiency that caused the delay, when all this time my package was sitting in some little postal outlet somewhere, being “sorted”… apparently over several days.  Go figure.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.